Friday, December 14, 2018

Risk Assessments

What is a risk assessment?

Risk assessment is a term used to describe the overall process or method where you: Identify hazards and risk factors that have the potential to cause harm (hazard identification). Analyze and evaluate the risk associated with that hazard (risk analysis, and risk evaluation).


Why is risk assessment important?


Risk assessments are very important as they form an integral part of an occupational health and safety management plan. They help to: 
  • Create awareness of hazards and risk.
  • Identify who may be at risk (e.g., employees, cleaners, visitors, contractors, the public, etc.). 
  • Determine whether a control program is required for a particular hazard.
  • Determine if existing control measures are adequate or if more should be done. 
  • Prevent injuries or illnesses, especially when done at the design or planning stage.
  • Prioritize hazards and control measures.
  • Meet legal requirements where applicable.
What is the goal of risk assessment?
The aim of the risk assessment process is to evaluate hazards, then remove that hazard or minimize the level of its risk by adding control measures, as necessary. By doing so, you have created a safer and healthier workplace. 
The goal is to try to answer the following questions:
  1. What can happen and under what circumstances?
  2. What are the possible consequences?
  3. How likely are the possible consequences to occur?
  4. Is the risk controlled effectively, or is further action required?


When should a risk assessment be done?


There may be many reasons a risk assessment is needed, including:
  • Before new processes or activities are introduced.
  • Before changes are introduced to existing processes or activities, including when products, machinery, tools, equipment change or new information concerning harm becomes available.
  • When hazards are identified.


How do you plan for a risk assessment?


In general, determine:
  • What the scope of your risk assessment will be (e.g., be specific about what you are assessing such as the lifetime of the product, the physical area where the work activity takes place, or the types of hazards).
  • The resources needed (e.g., train a team of individuals to carry out the assessment, the types of information sources, etc.).
  • What type of risk analysis measures will be used (e.g., how exact the scale or parameters need to be in order to provide the most relevant evaluation).
  • Who are the stakeholders involved (e.g., manager, supervisors, workers, worker representatives, suppliers, etc.).
  • What relevant laws, regulations, codes, or standards may apply in your jurisdiction, as well as organizational policies and procedures.


How is a risk assessment done?


Assessments should be done by a competent person or team of individuals who have a good working knowledge of the situation being studied. Include either on the team or as sources of information, the supervisors and workers who work with the process under review as these individuals are the most familiar with the operation. 
In general, to do an assessment, you should: 
  • Identify hazards.
  • Determine the likelihood of harm, such as an injury or illness occurring, and its severity. 
    • Consider normal operational situations as well as non-standard events such as maintenance, shutdowns, power outages, emergencies, extreme weather, etc. 
    • Review all available health and safety information about the hazard such as Safety Data Sheet (SDS), manufacturers literature, information from reputable organizations, results of testing, workplace inspection reports, records of workplace incidents (accidents), including information about the type and frequency of the occurrence, illnesses, injuries, near misses, etc. 
    • Understand the minimum legislated requirements for your jurisdiction.
  • Identify actions necessary to eliminate the hazard, or control the risk using the hierarchy of risk control methods. 
  • Evaluate to confirm if the hazard has been eliminated or if the risk is appropriately controlled.
  • Monitor to make sure the control continues to be effective.
  • Keep any documents or records that may be necessary. Documentation may include detailing the process used to assess the risk, outlining any evaluations, or detailing how conclusions were made.
When doing an assessment, also take into account:
  • The methods and procedures used in the processing, use, handling or storage of the substance, etc.
  • The actual and the potential exposure of workers (e.g., how many workers may be exposed, what that exposure is/will be, and how often they will be exposed).
  • The measures and procedures necessary to control such exposure by means of engineering controls, work practices, and hygiene practices and facilities. 
  • The duration and frequency of the task (how long and how often a task is done).
  • The location where the task is done.
  • The machinery, tools, materials, etc. that are used in the operation and how they are used (e.g., the physical state of a chemical, or lifting heavy loads for a distance).
  • Any possible interactions with other activities in the area and if the task could affect others (e.g., cleaners, visitors, etc.). 
  • The lifecycle of the product, process or service (e.g., design, construction, uses, decommissioning).
  • The education and training the workers have received.
  • How a person would react in a particular situation (e.g., what would be the most common reaction by a person if the machine failed or malfunctioned).
It is important to remember that the assessment must take into account not only the current state of the workplace but any potential situations as well.
By determining the level of risk associated with the hazard, the employer, and the health and safety committee (where appropriate), can decide whether a control program is required and to what level.


How are the hazards identified?


Overall, the goal is to find and record possible hazards that may be present in your workplace. It may help to work as a team and include both people familiar with the work area, as well as people who are not - this way you have both the experienced and fresh eye to conduct the inspection. In either case, the person or team should be competent to carry out the assessment and have good knowledge about the hazard being assessed, any situations that might likely occur, and protective measures appropriate to that hazard or risk.
To be sure that all hazards are found:
  • Look at all aspects of the work.
  • Include non-routine activities such as maintenance, repair, or cleaning.
  • Look at accident / incident / near-miss records. 
  • Include people who work off site either at home, on other job sites, drivers, teleworkers, with clients, etc.
  • Look at the way the work is organized or done (include experience of people doing the work, systems being used, etc). 
  • Look at foreseeable unusual conditions (for example: possible impact on hazard control procedures that may be unavailable in an emergency situation, power outage, etc.).
  • Determine whether a product, machine or equipment can be intentionally or unintentionally changed (e.g., a safety guard that could be removed).
  • Review all of the phases of the lifecycle. 
  • Examine risks to visitors or the public.
  • Consider the groups of people that may have a different level of risk such as young or inexperienced workers, persons with disabilities, or new or expectant mothers. 
It may help to create a chart or table such as the following: 
Example of Risk Assessment 
Task Hazard Risk Priority Control 
Delivering product to customersDrivers work aloneMay be unable to call for help if needed
Drivers have to occasionally work long hoursFatigue, short rest time between shifts
Drivers are often in very congested trafficIncreased chance of collision
Longer working hours
Drivers have to lift boxes when delivering productInjury to back from lifting, reaching, carrying, etc.


How do you know if the hazard will cause harm (poses a risk)?


Each hazard should be studied to determine its' level of risk. To research the hazard, you can look at:
  • Product information / manufacturer documentation.
  • Past experience (knowledge from workers, etc.).
  • Legislated requirements and/or applicable standards. 
  • Industry codes of practice / best practices.
  • Health and safety material about the hazard such as safety data sheets (SDSs), research studies, or other manufacturer information. 
  • Information from reputable organizations.
  • Results of testing (atmospheric or air sampling of workplace, biological swabs, etc.). 
  • The expertise of an occupational health and safety professional. 
  • Information about previous injuries, illnesses, near misses, incident reports, etc. 
  • Observation of the process or task.
Remember to include factors that contribute to the level of risk such as: 
  • The work environment (layout, condition, etc.). 
  • The systems of work being used. 
  • The range of foreseeable conditions. 
  • The way the source may cause harm (e.g., inhalation, ingestion, etc.).
  • How often and how much a person will be exposed.
  • The interaction, capability, skill, experience of workers who do the work.

How are risks ranked or prioritized?


Ranking or prioritizing hazards is one way to help determine which risk is the most serious and thus which to control first. Priority is usually established by taking into account the employee exposure and the potential for incident, injury or illness. By assigning a priority to the risks, you are creating a ranking or an action list. 
There is no one simple or single way to determine the level of risk. Nor will a single technique apply in all situations. The organization has to determine which technique will work best for each situation. Ranking hazards requires the knowledge of the workplace activities, urgency of situations, and most importantly, objective judgement. 
For simple or less complex situations, an assessment can literally be a discussion or brainstorming session based on knowledge and experience. In some cases, checklists or a probability matrix can be helpful. For more complex situations, a team of knowledgeable personnel who are familiar with the work is usually necessary. 
As an example, consider this simple risk matrix. Table 1 shows the relationship between probability and severity. 
Risk Matrix
Severity ratings in this example represent:
  • High: major fracture, poisoning, significant loss of blood, serious head injury, or fatal disease
  • Medium: sprain, strain, localized burn, dermatitis, asthma, injury requiring days off work
  • Low: an injury that requires first aid only; short-term pain, irritation, or dizziness
Probability ratings in this example represent:
  • High: likely to be experienced once or twice a year by an individual
  • Medium: may be experienced once every five years by an individual
  • Low: may occur once during a working lifetime
The cells in Table 1 correspond to a risk level, as shown in Table 2.
Risk Ratings
These risk ratings correspond to recommended actions such as:
  • Immediately dangerous: stop the process and implement controls
  • High risk: investigate the process and implement controls immediately
  • Medium risk: keep the process going; however, a control plan must be developed and should be implemented as soon as possible
  • Low risk: keep the process going, but monitor regularly. A control plan should also be investigated
  • Very low risk: keep monitoring the process
Let's use an example: When painting a room, a step stool must be used to reach higher areas. The individual will not be standing higher than 1 metre (3 feet) at any time. The assessment team reviewed the situation and agrees that working from a step stool at 1 m is likely to:
  • Cause a short-term injury such as a strain or sprain if the individual falls. A severe sprain may require days off work. This outcome is similar to a medium severity rating.
  • Occur once in a working lifetime as painting is an uncommon activity for this organization. This criterion is similar to a low probability rating.
When compared to the risk matrix chart (Table 1), these values correspond to a low risk. 
Risk Matrix / Ratings
The workplace decides to implement risk control measures, including the use of a stool with a large top that will allow the individual to maintain stability when standing on the stool. They also determined that while the floor surface is flat, they provided training to the individual on the importance of making sure the stool's legs always rest on the flat surface. The training also included steps to avoid excess reaching while painting.


What are methods of hazard control?


Once you have established the priorities, the organization can decide on ways to control each specific hazard. Hazard control methods are often grouped into the following categories: 
  • Elimination (including substitution).
  • Engineering controls.
  • Administrative controls.
  • Personal protective equipment.

Why is it important to review and monitor the assessments?


It is important to know if your risk assessment was complete and accurate. It is also essential to be sure that any changes in the workplace have not introduced new hazards or changed hazards that were once ranked as lower priority to a higher priority.
It is good practice to review your assessment on a regular basis to make sure your control methods are effective.


What documentation should be done for a risk assessment?


Keeping records of your assessment and any control actions taken is very important. You may be required to store assessments for a specific number of years. Check for local requirements in your jurisdiction.
The level of documentation or record keeping will depend on: 
  • Level of risk involved.
  • Legislated requirements.
  • Requirements of any management systems that may be in place.
Your records should show that you: 
  • Conducted a good hazard review.
  • Determined the risks of those hazards.
  • Implemented control measures suitable for the risk.
  • Reviewed and monitored all hazards in the workplace.




The HSE suggests that risk assessments should follow five simple steps:
  • Step 1: Identify the hazards.
  • Step 2: Decide who might be harmed and how.
  • Step 3: Evaluate the risks and decide on precautions.
  • Step 4: Record your findings and implement them.
  • Step 5: Review your assessment and update if necessary.






https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/risk_assessment.html

Friday, November 16, 2018

Health and Safety

In the studio or on location safety is very important. To prevent damage to yourself, other or equipment you should:


  • Make sure that all wires are neat, this in case of someone tripping on them and hurting themselves 
  • In case of a fire or a needed use for an emergency exit, signs must be prominent 
  • Food and drink are a huge hazard around electrical equipment 
  • In a studio the kit can get hot, so don't touch bulbs that have been on for a while in case of burning yourself. As well as this, they are very bright so its important to try and not look at them or for too long and don't shine bright lights at others.
  • If you require help, you can always ask for it even more so when lifting heavy items.
  • overcrowding in small spaces. In the studio it can get crowded, it is easy for people to get in the way so keep the number of people to a minimum. 

Thursday, November 15, 2018

New Wave and Evaluation

Finished Video

Evaluation


After I finished editing the New Wave piece I was able to incorporate a few of the ideas that I planned to do before hand. The main idea of that I want to include POV (Point Of View) shots. As Jack filmed it, I was able to cut down very long shots into shorter ones. A 7 minute long take was included but by using mini jump cuts it fits to the length of the song. A editing technique that I thought of while editing that worked out quite well what to pace the clips very slightly apart so when playback it seems like he's blinking. This works even better as the camera is in first person. 
The non-diegetic sound that I chose fits with the editing pace, even though some parts are sped up. I also included two different 'rule of threes' as the camera/camera man was shown on reflective surfaces, this can take audiences out of their immersion but this is done on purpose. Another 'rule of threes' that I included was that the audio would cut out and the raw diegetic sound would play. 

The main point that I wanted to make while editing this piece was that a first person 'vlog' can still be shot in a new wave style of light. With natural lighting and casual conversations it is shot to be as normal as possible but as the diegetic sound plays phrases like "let's go shoot a new wave film" it creates a sense of. uniqueness as to my knowledge not many other new wave pieces do this. 

2 min New Wave Sequence Brief


New Wave Brief

For this on location shoot we shot in Coventry,

A technical aspect that we would like to use heavily is using a continuous POV shot. This is not conventional of most films that are showcased in American New Wave and does class as a shot type that is more commonly used in films that are New Wave.
In terms of the mise-en-scene: lighting, sound and editing these settings will be set to a more natural state. With similar aspects as 'found footage' we aim for immersion in a natural way.
Something that I find quite interesting in new wave films is that they're sometimes badly edited on purpose. For this I will aim to included a range of odd but intriguing editing styles along side the non-diegetic and diegetic sound. For the music that I will aim for is a simple and chill beat, something that would be not relied on but an aspect of the piece that would seem strange without. Maybe even an audience would be able to appreciate as even though not much is happening they will be able to link the music to the action on screen. In this case a slow/chill beat would fit nicely against the person walking and doing activities that doesn't require any excitement or stress.
I will also like to incorporate sped up footage as these are long takes, I would like to show a lot of them in a short time. However, another way which I might try out is to edit pieces out so even though the forge is playing at a normal speed, it is quick and snappy in terms of when it is cut. For example, a minute long video can be shortened by cutting out three seconds when five seconds pass. Creating mini jump-cuts.
I would like to include a rule of three, but I am not sure which I prefer. Maybe a phrase being said, the audience being able to see the camera or an action from other people on screen. (I will test them and see which one I like best)
Something that I think would be quite nice to add in is that in parts a phrase is said. Most of the time the non-diegetic sound will be playing but I think that the piece would be more unique if in the editing process I don't mute some of the clips, maybe do it on key phrases so that the audience knows there watching a film rather than being immersed.



418 words

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

New Hollywood - Easy Rider

1 Nov 1955 – 30 Apr 1975 - These are the dates of the Vietnam war. Its not mentioned in the film. Even though a new wave film focusses on real issues going on rather than creating a fantasy, it's not focussed on. Yet drugs are. This could be because of the characters want to escape and drugs are a good way of doing that. And then from the camera, an audience is able to see and experience what that's like with the way it is edited with a small montage sequence. 

These type of films would be more targeted at a younger gerneation 18-25 in terms of age nut with the use of a care-free and drug using lifestyle hippies would be able to relate to this type of film. A more open-minded audience member. Other who were curious were able to see what happens when people are involved with this as well. Overall a very inadvertently educational, looking at a non mainstream way of living. 
Comparing it to the Vietnam war, This film enforces the counterculture as look to drugs and social behaviour, (hanging out with friends) as Hippies, and youths/everyone didn't want to know about the war. It was very adamant that it was going on, using escapism, this film captures what life would be like to have a care free look towards issues like war. 

Contextualised References:

 Horwath, A. Elsaesser, T. King, N. (2004)"There was wholesale nudity, unmistakable evidence of fucking, orgies, drugs and language."

Santas, C. (2001) "Directed by Dennis Hopper, Easy Rider came at the end of the sixties when antisocial unrest, mainly caused by the Vietnam war, had reached its climax. The movie had some characteristics similar to those of the Western genre, but it was more an 'Eastern', since its vagabonds on motorcycles were traveling east in search of freedom."



Bapis, E M. (2009) "...Arrived front and center in America to meld new counterculture men with the men of Westerns past".

Bibliography:

Horwath, A. Elsaesser, T. King, N. (2004) The Last Great American Picture Show: New Hollywood in the 1970s Amsterdam University Press

Santas, C. (2001) Responding to film: A Text Guide for Students of Cinema Art Burnham Inc. 

Bapis, E M. (2009) Camera and Action: Film as Agent of Social Change 1965 - 1975 McFarland & Company Inc. 

New Hollywood - Taxi Driver

Something that wasn't mentioned throughout this film was the Vietnam war. The audience learn that Travis was given honourable discharge from the marines but it was never stated that it was from this particular war. The Vietnam war caused a large portion of the the film to include such violence.

Research links/videos:



Contextualised References:



Schrader, P. (2000) ”One of the key films of the 1970s and winner of the Palme d'Or at the 1976 Cannes film Festival… Taxi Driver remains a devastating portrait of a man in urban purgatory". 

Macnab, G. (2005) Pauline Kael states "no other film has ever dramatised urban indifference so powerfully; at first, here, its horrifyingly funny, and then it's just horrifying". - to get this kind of reaction from a critic that is so trusted and influential was great for Scorsese.

Corrigan, T. White, P. (2012) - include image on desktop!!!!! 
"The famous scene in which the main character, Travis Bickle, confronts his mirror image demonstrates a divided and shifting identity."

Corrigan, T. White, P. (2012) - include image on desktop!!!!! 
"The windshield functions as a frame for Travis Bickle’s limited point of view."

Sangster, J. Condon, P. (2002) - extra detail - shot on 35mm "SUMMARY: - Honourable discharge marines - job, taxi driver - insomnia--- SHOW TRAILER----

Bibliography:

Sangster, J. Condon, P. (2002) Scorsese - Taxi Driver - Virgin Films Ltd.

Macnab, G. (2005) The Making of Taxi Driver  - Critical reaction - Unanimous Ltd.

Schrader, P. (2000) Taxi Driver Faber & Faber - biography - awards: One of the key films of the 1970s and winner of the Palme d'Or at the 1976 Cannes film Festival…

Corrigan, T. White, P. (2012) The Film Experience: An Introduction - History and Historiography: Hollywood and Beyond Chapter 10 Bedford/St. Martin's 

New Hollywood - Bonnie and Clyde

Contextualised References:
Corrigan, C. White, P. (2014:160) discussed "Here Bonnie's restless movements are depicted by a series of jerky shots, and we sense her boredom and frustration through the editing".



Corrigan, C. White, P. (2014:161) mentions "Clyde's famous death sequence uses slow-motion cinematography, cutting on movement, and overlapping editing".



Blumenthal, K. (2018) states "For decades, they've been as famous as any pair of outlaws could be. They're the ones who adored fast cars and faster living. The dangerous young couple with undying love for each other". 

Influenced?

Directors like Quentin Tarantino...

 http://www.newwavefilm.com/international/new-hollywood.shtml "They spoke for a generation disillusioned by the Vietnam War, disenchanted by the ruling elite".
The Vietnam War drove the idea of violence for this film. 

Bibliography:

http://www.newwavefilm.com/international/new-hollywood.shtml

Corrigan, C. White, P. (2014) The Film Experience: An Introduction. Patterns of Editing in Bonnie and Clyde. Bedford/St. Martin's 160-161

Blumenthal, K. (2018) Bonnie and Clyde: The Making of a Legend - Prologue - Penguin

Development in Editing Technology

"The very earliest filmmakers were afraid to edit film shots together because they assumed that splicing together different shots of d...